27. January 2012

0 Comments

Civil Liberties College Tour

yal_logoJoin Young Americans for Liberty, The Ohio State University Chapter on February 9th for The Civil Liberties Tour. This event is titled “The War on Terrorism, Civil Liberties, and the Constitution” and will be held on the campus of The Ohio State University in the Conference Theater inside The Ohio Union.

This one-of-a-kind college tour brings together Glenn Greenwald, Bruce Fein, and Jacob Hornberger to discuss the greatest threats to our constitutional republic and individual rights. The tour will be moderated by YAL’s own Jack Hunter, and hosted by YAL @ OSU in conjunction with The Future of Freedom Foundation.

Topics to be covered include habeas corpus, the PATRIOT Act, extraordinary rendition, torture, regime change, and a general discussion about how the war on terrorism has infringed upon the rights of U.S. citizens in the name of making us safe.

What: Civil Liberties College Tour
When: Thrusday, February 9, 2012 7:30 PM
Where: Conference Theater in The Ohio Union, Parking Garage Next to Building
Cost: FREE

Continue reading...

11. January 2012

1 Comment

In New Hampshire, Dead People Can Vote Too

Continue reading...

6. January 2012

0 Comments

Ohio Liberty Council Supports Ohio Congressman Bill Johnson’s Legal Investigation of President’s Actions

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Thursday, January 5, 2012
Contact: Tom Zawistowski, TomZ [at] OhioLibertyCouncil [dot] org
Congressman Bill Johnson bill [at] billjohnsonleads [dot] com

OHIO LIBERTY COUNCIL SUPPORTS OHIO CONGRESSMAN BILL JOHNSON’S
LEGAL INVESTIGATION OF PRESIDENT’S ACTIONS

Columbus, Ohio – The Ohio Liberty Council, announced this evening that its members support Ohio Congressman Bill Johnson’s legal investigation into President Obama’s actions in appointing Richard Cordray and three members of the NLRB Board this week. In a brief statement OLC President Tom Zawistowski said, “We applaud Congressman Johnson for taking a leadership role and doing his duty to protect and defend the Constitution. Our members and all liberty minded citizens demand that all of our elected officials follow the Constitution and if they do not, then they must be removed from office. We will do everything in our power to support Congressman Johnson’s efforts and those of any elected officials who take action to stop the President from shredding the Constitution and assuming powers that are not explicitly granted to him by the citizens of the United States.”

In a television interview on Fox Business with Neil Cavuto this evening, Johnson said that he would undertake a legal investigation beginning on Friday morning and would file suit against the President if necessary to stop these actions. Toward the end of the interview, host Neil Cavuto suggested that if the Congressman could make the case, the President’s action this week could be an impeachable offense. Video of the interview is available at this link:

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1368195456001/are-obamas-nlrb-recess-appointments-an-impeachable-offense/?playlist_id=87185

The Ohio Liberty Council is a council of leaders whose purpose is to unite conservative grassroots organizations for greater effectiveness in the state and nation, and to provide resources for member organizations to strengthen their groups. The OLC currently has over 75 liberty-minded groups across Ohio who are members of its coalition.

###

Continue reading...

6. January 2012

0 Comments

Are Obama’s NLRB Recess Appointments an Impeachable Offense?

Last night on Fox Business with Neal Cavuto, Ohio Congressman Bill Johnson announced that he would investigate taking legal action to stop President Obama appointments of Richard Cordray and the NLRB Board appointments made on Wednesday. During the interview Cavuto suggested that if the President is found to have violated the Constitution that it would be an impeachable offense. Johnson replied by saying that he would follow the legal trail wherever it leads. You can watch the video here

Continue reading...

5. January 2012

0 Comments

Ohio Liberty Council Reacts to President Obama Appointments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Thursday, January 5, 2012
Contact: Tom Zawistowski, TomZ [at] OhioLibertyCouncil [dot] org

OHIO LIBERTY COUNCIL REACTS TO OBAMA APPOINTMENTS

Columbus, Ohio – The Ohio Liberty Council, speaking for it’s member liberty groups, reacted harshly to President Barack Obama’s appointment of Richard Cordray as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Board and his filling of three vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board Wednesday. Tom Zawistowski, President of the OLC said in a statement, “Those of us in the liberty movement see the illegal and un-Constitutional actions by the President yesterday as a threat to the very future of our nation. Either we are a nation of laws or we are not. Either we follow the Constitution or we dissolve the union. We call upon members of the Senate and the House, from both parties, to honor their oath of office and take every necessary action to protect and defend the Constitution against this illegal usurpation of power by the executive branch.”

Zawistowski went on to say “The Consumer Financial Protection Board itself is un-Constitutional and the method by which this President choose to appoint its director and to take control of the National Labor Relations Board confirms the intent of this President to disregard the Constitution at every turn. The President swore an oath to “protect and defend” the Constitution and he has clearly reneged on that oath by these actions. If a President does not believe in the Constitution of the United States then he should resign, or be removed from office, because the vast majority of Americans do believe in the Constitution and are ready and willing to defend it.”

The Ohio Liberty Council is a council of leaders whose purpose is to unite conservative grassroots organizations for greater effectiveness in the state and nation, and to provide resources for member organizations to strengthen their groups. The OLC currently has over 75 liberty-minded groups across Ohio who are members of its coalition.

###

Continue reading...

22. November 2011

0 Comments

George Soros Helped Craft Stimulus Then Invested in Companies Benefiting

From BigGovernment.com

Billionaire George Soros gave advice and direction on how President Obama should allocate so-called “stimulus” money in a series of regular private meetings and consultations with White House senior advisers even as Soros was making investments in areas affected by the stimulus program.

Mr. Soros met with Mr. Obama’s top economist on February 25, 2009 and twice more with senior officials in the Old Executive Office Building on March 24th and 25th as the stimulus plan was being crafted. Later, Mr. Soros also participated in discussions on financial reform.

Then, in the first quarter of 2009, Mr. Soros went on a stock buying spree in companies that ultimately benefited from the federal stimulus.

The article points out over 10 instances where stimulus money went to companies that Soros was invested in. One example is Columbus based American Electric Power which received 1 billion dollars in stimulus money. The Soros Connection? He purchased 1.5 million shares of their stock.

See the entire list of Soros’ stimulus investments at BigGovernment

Continue reading...

11. November 2011

1 Comment

The Ohio Liberty Council Clarifies Relationship with Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment Initiative

For Immediate Release – November 11, 2011

Contact: Tom Zawistowski

COLUMBUS- Tom Zawistowski, the President of the Ohio Liberty Council (OLC) , today released a clarification concerning the organization’s relationship with the Ohioan’s for Workplace Freedom and the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment. Zawistowski explained the reason for the clarification by stating “Press reports since Thursday have included some statements concerning the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment that are inaccurate and therefore require a clarification. First, some reports have suggested that the Ohio Liberty Council is sponsoring the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment. This is not true, the group that is sponsoring the Amendment is the Ohioans for Workplace Freedom, a group that is separate from OLC and that was not started by the OLC. Several OLC Board Members and group leaders are involved with that organization, but they are not acting on behalf of the Ohio Liberty Council or it’s members. The OLC has rules that require a majority vote by our membership before endorsing any candidate or initiative and no such vote has been taken. This does not mean that the OLC will not endorse this initiative in the future, but it has not done so as of yet.”

Zawistowski continued by saying “Furthermore, some press reports have suggested that the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment was being put forward by “the group that got Issue 3 passed” on November 8th. This again is inaccurate. The group that got Issue 3 passed was primarily a spinoff from the Ohio Liberty Council that was called The Ohio Project as well as by a group called the Ohioan’s for Healthcare Freedom. Neither of those two groups have any formal involvement in the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment and most of the thousands of The Ohio Project volunteers had no knowledge of this initiative until they read about it in the press. Again, individuals who were involved in those groups are involved with the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment. However, they do not represent either of those groups in this case and it is our understanding that they did not intentionally suggest at any time that they were representing those organizations or the OLC.”

Zawistowski concluded by saying “I want to be clear that many members of the Patriot Movement across the state of Ohio are excited about “right to work” as a fundamental constitutional issue and believe in the goal of the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment. In fact many of those members signed the initial petitions that were submitted with the Amendment this Thursday. However, it is a common mistake for people to think that the “TEA Party” movement is an actual political party that acts in uninson, when in fact we are not. We are a loose affiliation of some 200+ independent liberty groups whose members make their own decisions about what they do and do not do, Each of those groups will eventually decide what involvement they wish to have with the Ohio Workplace Freedom Amendment after they have an opportunity to learn more about it.”


About the Ohio Liberty Council – www.ohiolibertycouncil.org – Twitter: @OhioLiberty

Begun in June 2009, the Council includes over 75 like-minded liberty organizations, and seeks “To unite, inform, and empower Ohio freedom loving groups and citizens to affect policy in favor of liberty.”

Continue reading...

8. November 2011

1 Comment

Why Ohio’s November 2011 Election Matters to Everyone

By Chris Littleton, Co-Founder, Ohio Liberty Council

This November 8th, Ohioans will cast a vote on two very important Issues – votes which many believe could set the tone for the nation’s entire political landscape in 2012.

Ohio Issue 3

Better known as the “Ohio Healthcare Freedom Amendment,” this vote is a chance for Ohioans to address Obama’s recently passed Federal Healthcare Bill mandate that you must purchase government defined health insurance or face fines and penalties if you do not comply.

The goal of this amendment to Ohio’s Constitution is: “To preserve the freedom of Ohioans to choose their health care and health care coverage.” Full Text of Amendment Here

Ohio Issue 2

This is a union led referendum to overturn a bill (SB-5) that passed in early 2011 which reforms government employee contracting in Ohio. Unions led this effort because most government employees in Ohio are unionized.

Below is some background on both these issues and why Ohio tea party leaders urge a YES vote for both of them!

Ohio Issue 3 – addresses healthcare mandates by amending Ohio’s Constitution

The Ohio Healthcare Freedom Amendment’s origin is as interesting as its impact.

In response to passage of Obama’s of the federal healthcare bill, and more specifically the individual mandate – in May of 2010, Ohio citizens began gathering what ended up being over 500,000 signatures in one of the largest volunteer signature gathering efforts in American history to make sure Ohioans had a chance to preserve their healthcare freedom by amending the state Constitution in the November 2011 election.

What will a YES vote on Issue 3 accomplish?

1.It will provide Ohio citizens with the best legal case possible to challenge the constitutionality of the federal healthcare bill’s mandate when it comes before the US Supreme Court.

2.It will prevent a mandate based healthcare system, like Massachusetts or Vermont, from ever being created in Ohio.

Why Issue 3 matters

1. We believe that healthcare decisions should be in our hands – not the hands of politicians and bureaucrats.

2. We believe that mandates which compel behavior, through threat of penalties and fines, fundamentally limit personal freedom.

3. We believe the United States Constitution clearly states our rights to liberty and property cannot be removed without due process, and in this instance – the federal mandate to purchase government defined health insurance infringes on both of those rights.

4. We believe that Ohio must take a stand on freedom of choice in healthcare to protect both our state and nation moving forward.

Because the amendment to Ohio’s Bill of Rights was initiated by and will be voted on by its residents, passage will provide unique standing for Ohioans to have the Supreme Court hear the case on the basis of infringement of their rights as defined in both the U.S. and Ohio constitutions. To date – no one else has been able to challenge the federal mandate from this unique perspective.

What Issue 3 means to the nation

From a national and political perspective, it is particularly interesting because this vote will define the intensity of opposition to both President Obama and Democrat Senator Sherrod Brown ahead of the 2012 election, when both will be on the ballot. Of additional importance, this will be done in the nation’s biggest swing state – Ohio.

The Ohio Issue 3 vote can significantly alter the dynamics of the 2012 campaign because Obama and Brown will be forced to defend this most emotional of issues with Ohio voters – an issue toward which Americans have shown strong opposition in almost every poll. In fact, opposition to the mandate has increased in many polls gauging attitudes toward Obama’s health care act passed last year.

If Obama is forced to run a 2012 campaign on issues about a failing economy coupled with a narrative of government infringement on freedom of choice in health care – the most personal of all decisions for most people – he will be in real trouble. He can’t afford to lose this challenge to his agenda, and, at this moment, that appears to be likely.

Public Policy Polling summarized the results of its recent poll this way: “By a 55-24 margin, voters say if the election was today that they would support Issue 3, which is basically meant to counteract Barack Obama’s health care plan. Republicans unsurprisingly support it by a 70-12 margin and so do independents, 58-21. More striking is that Democrats say right now that they’d vote for it 41-35.”

Of particular interest, 37 percent of the poll’s respondents supporting the amendment had voted for Obama in 2008, and 40 percent supporting the amendment identify themselves as liberal.

Freedom of choice in health care decisions has united liberals and conservatives in opposition to Obama.

Is anyone shocked that Americans believe that government involvement in their health care decisions is bad? Is anyone surprised that people choose freedom over compulsion as a way of life? Is anyone shocked that people believe government should have no power to make them purchase a commercial product just because they are alive?

This horrible infringement on personal freedom is something on which almost all Americans agree. Mr. Obama finally has accomplished what he set out to achieve: a post-partisan, post-racial America united in common cause. But, in this case, that common cause has become opposition to him and his policies.

For these reasons and many more, we encourage all Ohioans to vote YES on Issue 3!

You can learn more or support the Healthcare Freedom Amendment campaign HERE!

Ohio Issue 2 – addresses government employment contracts

Why is reform of government employee contracting needed?

Once considered a “grand bargain,” government employees took less pay in exchange for better benefits. But as time has progressed – both pay and benefits for government employees has far outpaced that of the private sector in Ohio.

Enter our cruel friend mathematics. Math doesn’t care what we feel or what is fair. Math only knows truth. And the truth is – our state is broke. Many of our cities and counties are broke, and everyone is well aware our nation is broke.

Ohio politicians, mostly Republicans over the last 20 years I might add, have been pigs at the troth. Building government, growing government, expanding size, scope and influence into every imaginable part of life. But during this 20 years when Ohio should have “boomed,” if you compare us to the remainder of the US – we didn’t boom. That is, unless you consider the growth of government. Ohio added 1 government job for every 1.65 private sector jobs.

Maybe this is even easier to understand – a report from the Buckeye Institute showed that, from 2000 to today, Ohio’s private sector has lost a net of 612,700 jobs. That means there are over 600,000 fewer workers whose activities generated tax revenues to fund government.

This situation is clearly unsustainable, yet these are the current realties

-        Wages: state employees in Ohio currently make 28% more than their private sector counterparts.

-        Benefits: private sector Ohioans pay close to 30% of their own healthcare premiums while many government employee union contracts have them paying closer to just 10% of their premiums.

-        Retirement: In the private sector, average employee match of 401K contributions  is between 4%-6%. And remember, 401K’s are not a pension or defined benefit plan like all government employees. Apart from the fact that government employees don’t pay social security taxes, many weren’t even paying their own share into their pension plans. In a practice called “pension pickup,” some government employees share of their pension contributions were being picked up by the taxpayers.

-        Job security: As established above, the private sector was decimated in Ohio, but the government employees continued with the same pattern of growth, much of which included things like – guaranteed raises, job security based on seniority – not merit, and much more.

To give you an idea of how dangerous this situation remains, just look at funding for Ohio schools. In just 4 years, 96% of current school funding will be spent on staff compensation leaving Ohio with a deficit in school funding of over $7.65 billion.

The question isn’t, will Ohio go broke – it is when will Ohio go broke? Unfortunately – collective bargaining made possible through government unions has made the necessary reforms almost impossible until now.

Passage of the bill (SB-5) addressed these problems and gave local governing bodies the tools they needed to fix their respective government employment contracts.

What are the some of the primary components of the bill?

  1. Government employees will now be required to pay at least 15% toward the healthcare premiums.
  2. Government employees will be required to contribute at least 10% toward their own pensions.
  3. Government employees will no longer be forced to pay union dues or fair share just to have a job.
  4. Layoffs are now determined with a factor of performance, not heavily weighted to seniority.
  5. Automatic pay raises, which weren’t considering merit, will be ended.
  6. Binding arbitration in collective bargaining process will be eliminated and contract disputes will be settled by the respective governing body.

This is clearly a common sense approach to government that revolves around fiscal responsibility – something every person in Ohio understands. Yet, the unions want the bill overturned because they do not want change the status quo.

What they don’t seem to acknowledge is that we are out of time, and have very few options. Reforming these government employee contracts is definitely a necessary step. If we do not make the adjustments now, we are going to see catastrophic layoffs or significant tax increases. There are no other choices.

Unions are fighting very hard on this issue with national money pouring into Ohio as you can see HERE. If Ohio can’t weather this storm, it will be far more difficult to move forward on the common sense reforms which many states need to their government employee contracting system.

We must fight to keep this bill (SB-5) in place, and that is why we support a vote of YES on Issue 2!

You can learn more or support the Yes on Issue 2 campaign HERE!

Continue reading...